After midnight and I am still awake doing some paperwork.
That’s why I did decide to take a break with you and to post the daily one.
There isn’t much to say about it. It’s a tree with moss and decay and a little pareidolia. Even if I have problems to consider plants and trees as source for natural abstracts I thought I give this one a try. The only problem is: even without reading the description everybody knows what it is, and that’s pretty clearly against the definition of abstract photography. What do you think? Where is the borderline between: I see what it is and it still is abstract? Any ideas?